Scientific Research


  Football Refereeing - TPS Refereeing - Finalised in 1996  

 Copyrighted in INDIA & Won Prestigious Awards in EUROPE 

 FIFA informed in 1996 & Works Forwarded in June 2000 


Kris K. Panchoo is a Mauritian of Indian Origin and Senior Social Security Officer by profession. A great football fan !

From his early childhood football is his passion and always took the lead to organise matches, form teams, arrange for football equipments and play the game for long hours. Besides he is a regular spectator at local competition and live match spectator on television.  

Strangely Kris has never been a Referee in his life! Simply has a creative mind and did the unexpected !  "All creative people want to do the Unexpected."- Hedy Lamarr. 

He has made scientific research for a whole decade to come up with a Triangular and Panoramic System of Refereeing - finalised in 1996. TPS refereeing is fully described in his work entitled "Scientific Research Work for Football-Soccer Refereeing". It is scientifically worked out based upon mathematics, physics, mystic science and nature’s laws. Moreover it is a combined system of  the TRIANGULAR [3-side observation] & the PANORAMIC [top-view observation] working simultaneously which blocks all possibilities for refereeing errors to occur during football matches. 

TPS refereeing involves 2 additional Goal-linemen positioned above ground level at each goal post. All infringement of the game are spontaneously detected and sanctioned accordingly. Initially, from The Modular Triangular System, he developed the Triangular System (TS) of Observation and ultimately transformed it into the Triangular & Panoramic System (TPS) of Observation from mystic science. Hence TPS refereeing is formulated and obviously it is an out of the box innovation !


[Refer also to TPS2 - a more advanced version]. Had TPS been used since the creation of football, all refereeing errors daily seen would not have occurred ! 

TPS refereeing has been recognized in Europe and won a Diploma Award  with a Prestigious Prize of Genius-Budapest due to its scientific approach and originality during the 5th Genius Europe International Exhibition of Inventions, Works of Fine and Applied Arts -  2004.

 

THIS WORK IS REGISTERED WITH THE COPYRIGHT OFFICE  –  NEW DELHI ,  I N D I A 

No person, football club/association/federation/organization/board shall copy or carry out any performance of this work wholly or partly, directly or indirectly or in any modified form(s) and even through technology whatsoever. Doing so without prior permission in writing from the Copyright Owner shall commit an offence and shall face legal action and imprisonment under the Copyright  Act, 1957 and as amended by the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 1999.

© copyright 1986-2009 All rights reserved. [Kris K. Panchoo - Copyright Owner]

 

 

Kris invented a : 
   R E V O L U T I O N A R Y   SYSTEM           

                   R E F

T P S    R E F E R E E I N G
I  N  N  O  V  A  T  I  V  E    &    E  V  O  L  U  T  I  V  E
3  V E R S I O N S : for Present & Future [ Year 2050 ]

TS  -  TPS  -  TPS2 

 


FIFA CANNOT GO OUT OF THE BOX

DEVISED 3 SYSTEMS

[  NON-INNOVATIVE  ]

28 Referees System - 4 Touch Linesmen System  &  2 Referees System 

                            [ Next to come perhaps: 28 Touch Linesmen System ]

                                 NO  INNOVATION  !   T O T A L   F A I L U R E S  

VAR : Yet Another Big Failure - Chaos - Calls for Stoppage

             VAR : Total failure ! watch video below with interview                 USA Referee, Esfandiar Baharmast 

   16 cameras cannot capture what the referee can see/capture with his eyes on the playfield 

Full written report & more details - The New Normal [ click here ]          


HAS REFEREEING EVOLVED ?

LET 'S VERIFY with the incidences below.

Referee and side linesmen failed !                                                    With TPS refereeing, the Goal-lineman would have instantly detected the various faults as seen below and disallowed the goals or allowed the goals accordingly upon all fairness. 

From 1966 to 2010 - 44 years - absolutely nothing done in refereeing !
What a big shame to football-soccer, considered no.1 sport-game in the world !

Frank Lampard’s shot bounces into the goal behind Manuel Neuer ……….

A clear cut goal (equaliser) of the English well inside but denied by the officials in the 1/8 final World Cup 2010 between German and England, match played on 27/06/2010.

What a blunder !

England was unjustly eliminated.

Final score 4-1 in favour of Germany.

Watch video below.

In fact neither the referee nor the touch lineman is responsible.

It all due to parallax error.                                                     

On 30.07.1966 - Final world Cup 1966 - England v/s Germany
This time the lineman & referee validated Geoff Hurst's 'imaginary' goal which has never crossed the goal line.
Geoff Hurst himself confirms that it has never been a goal. See press report on
' Reference Page '. [click here]
Here because of too far observation both the referee and lineman could not detect whether the ball had crossed the goal line or not. Our eyes could see with clear vision only about 40-50 feet according to mystic science.

Another concrete proof and clear evidence of parallax error committed is the non-award of a clear cut goal of Allan Shearer. It was during a penalty forceful shot !                                            
The penalty kick effected by Newcastle – kicker Allan Shearer against Southampton in England on the 16th January 2000. 
There were only two players meaning no obstruction for clear view - kicker Shearer and Southampton goalkeeper were the only players inside the penalty/goal areas.
During penalty kick of course the referee is near the goal post and as well as touch lineman. 
Both of them were unable to see that the ball in fact had crossed the goal line, bounced well inside !
They both disallowed a genuine goal.  How astonishing!

Observation from ground level would not permit to have a vast vision; we see just some little portion.  Only from higher level (PANORAMIC OBSERVATION) we can have a clear and vast vision and thereby eliminating parallax error.
TPS refereeing takes absolute care to deal with PARALLAX !


      With TPS refereeing such errors will definitely not occur !

   Geoff Hurst's GHOST goal ? ( WorldCup 1966 )       Lampard's  goal refused (WorldCup2010)                                                                                                                      

DiegoMaradona        Lionel  Messi      ThieryHenry

 WATCH THESE VIDEOS 

How can goal-line technology help in above circumtances ?

The alarm would go to indicate GOAALS when infact they are non-valid goals to be disallowed.

This is adequate proof of the failures of goal-line technology.

Handgoals or rather FistgoalAWARDED IN  FOOTBALL !  

We better call it FISTBALL !

 

TPS Refereeing is the solution !

 

 

 

Roy Carroll, Pedro Mendes, the linesman, Gordon McQueen... no one can forget Spurs' phantom goal against Manchester United

By CHRIS WHEELER FOR THE DAILY MAIL  
UPDATED: 00:14 GMT, 24 April 2010

 It is one of the most talked about goal-line incidents since the 1966 World Cup.

It is January 4, 2005 - Manchester United and Tottenham are goalless at Old Trafford after 89 minutes when Spurs midfielder Pedro Mendes spots Roy Carroll well off his line in the dying moments and attempts to beat the United keeper with an ambitious effort from just over the halfway line. 

Although Carroll gets back in time, he spills the ball two yards over his line but instinctively turns to scoop it away with his right hand. With referee Mark Clattenburg and his assistant Rob Lewis too far away from the incident to judge, Mendes is denied a winning goal and United escape with a point. 

The above incident is a clear proof of the necessity of having a close/constant watch at all times on all the lines forming the football pitch.                                                                                                                  See :  DRAWINGS - [ click here ]


Following Maradona's hand goal in 1986, I worked out the Triangular System(TS) which would improve refereeing to a great extent but not to PERFECTION. It took me almost 10 years to find the PERFECT SOLUTION and thus I transformed the Triangular System (TS) into TPS & TPS 2 (Triangular & Panoramic System).

The failure of TS I made mention in my registered copyright in India in the year 2000.

 

THE PHOTO BELOW IS A COPY OF TRIANGULAR SYSTEM (TS) AND ITS IMPERFECTION WHICH I MENTIONED 19 YEARS AGO IN MY RESEARCH WORK. THERE IS CLEAR MENTION OF SUCH INCIDENT IN MY MANUSCRIPT - [Allan Shearer Penalty's Kick on 16.01.2000 - Newcastle vs Souththampton - Clear Goal Disallowed].                    The reason is simply due to PARALLAX  ! but can be solved by a change in angle from ground level to top level.

WHAT A BLUNDER !!

Ukraine v England - Euro 2012

By : 

10:35AM BST 20 Jun 2012

Blokhin was understandably angry after Marko Devic's second-half effort was wrongly disallowed. Replays showed the ball crossed the line before it was cleared by John Terry, but neither the referee nor the fifth official were convinced. It would have brought the hosts level with 30 minutes remaining and given them a chance of salvaging their status in the competition.

"There are five referees on the pitch and the ball is 50cm behind the goal-line. Why do we need five officials?" he said.

"They don't spot (Andy) Carroll's elbow, either? Or that (John) Terry fouls one of my players in the back?

"(Pierluigi) Collina told us that every movement with an elbow is a card, and every foul from behind is a yellow card. And yet where was that today? You write what you want – you've seen it. I don't want to criticise the referee."

Blokhin's observations were overshadowed by an extraordinary argument with a local journalist over his side's performance. The former Soviet Union star had been prickly before the game. However, that was nothing compared to what happened after his side had crashed out of the competition.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Fifa boss told his Twitter followers he thought it was time the new system was brought in after the Euro 2012 co-hosts were denied an equaliser in last night's 1-0 Group D defeat to England.

Officials - including the additional referee behind the goal which Blatter insisted on introducing last year - didn't spot that Marco Devic's shot had crossed the line.


Read more: http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/902643-sepp-blatter-goal-line-technology-a-necessity-after-england-v-ukraine#ixzz1yRusxBHS


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Euro 2012: UEFA's Collina admits mistake over Ukraine 'goal'

June 21, 2012 9:36 am 
WARSAW - Head of referees Pierluigi Collina defended UEFA's experimental system of extra goal-line officials on Wednesday but admitted to an "unfortunate mistake" that controversially helped eliminate Ukraine from Euro 2012.

In a tournament heavy on goals and drama but relatively free of debatable decisions, Marco Devic's disallowed effort against England on Tuesday (early Wednesday, PHL time), which television replays suggested may have crossed the line, prompted outrage from the hosts.

The goal may not have saved Ukraine from elimination anyway but the referee in charge of the game, Hungary's Viktor Kassai, was one of four sent home on Wednesday as part of a standard pruning of officials before the quarterfinals.

Collina said it would have been "unfair" to expose Kassai to additional pressure following the row, which has prompted renewed calls for the introduction of goal-line technology.

The bald-headed Italian, the game's best-known official before his retirement in 2005, insisted the decision did not undermine a system of extra officials which has been on trial in the Champions League and elsewhere for three years.

"This was human mistake made by a human being. Nevertheless this is the only problem we had with this experiment in roughly 1000 matches played," Collina said.

"[At Euro 2012] we had three goal-line situations. Two of them were absolutely correct, the third was unfortunately wrong. Being wrong is one thing, saying that the ball was half a meter over is another and you know it. The ball was centimeters [over]."

He refused to be drawn on the case for introducing technology which proponents argue would remove the element of human error.

"The simple answer to that is that it is not for UEFA to decide. There is a meeting of the IFAB [International Football Association Board] on July 5," UEFA General Secretary Gianni Infantino told the same news conference.

"We do what we can. We think that in addition to seeing or not seeing the goal, the additional referee gives a lot of help. The fact that a mistake happened last night, the night before this press conference, is bad luck, but it should not hinder us in our very positive assessment of the last three years.

"We will see what the IFAB decides and we will see which leagues implement it if they do. But for the moment we have not seen any 100 percent success rate so far on any goal-line technology," Infantino added. - Reuters

http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/06/20/euro-2012-ukraine-was-denied-a-goal-vs-england-chief-referee-admits/

Euro 2012

Euro 2012: Ukraine denied a goal vs. England, chief referee admits

  Jun 20, 2012 – 11:05 AM ET | Last Updated: Jun 20, 2012 11:30 AM ET

UEFA’s chief refereeing officer Pierluigi Collina on Wednesday said that a Ukraine effort ruled out against England in their final Euro 2012 Group D match for not crossing the goal line should have been given.

WARSAW — UEFA’s chief refereeing officer Pierluigi Collina on Wednesday said that a Ukraine effort ruled out against England in their final Euro 2012 Group D match for not crossing the goal line should have been given.

Collina’s assessment and outrage in Ukraine have once again opened the debate about the introduction of goal-line technology that world governing body FIFA is in favour of but its European counterparts UEFA is against.

“The ball crossed the line. That was unfortunate,” Collina told a news conference in the Polish capital, Warsaw, the day after the Group D match in Donetsk that England won 1-0.

Collina blamed human error for the “wrong” call but said decisions on two similar incidents in the 24 matches so far played in the tournament — in the Germany-Portugal and Italy-Croatia group matches — had been correct.

The incident arose in the 62nd minute of the game with the score at 1-0, when Ukraine’s Marko Devic forced England’s Joe Hart into a save and the ball looped back over the goalkeeper towards the net.

Defender John Terry acrobatically leapt to clear the ball from under the bar. Television replays indicated the ball crossed the line but Hungarian referee Viktor Kassai — advised by an assistant referee on the line — waved play on.

England kept their one-goal lead and advanced to a quarter-final meeting with Italy. Ukraine were eliminated, although a draw would still not have been enough to take them through.

Kassai’s decision was greeted with dismay in Ukraine.

“The result of the match turned on a gross error by the officials who didn’t give the Ukrainian goal,” Ukraine’s Sport-Express newspaper said on its website.

“And it all happened with five officials, two of whom were in charge of seeing whether a ball crosses the line.”

FIFA is trialling two prototypes of goal-line technology and a decision is expected on its introduction when the organisation’s rules body, the International Football Association Board, meets in Kiev in July.

FIFA president Sepp Blatter wrote on the micro-blogging site Twitter on Wednesday: “After last night’s match #GLT (goal-line technology) is no longer an alternative but a necessity.”

His UEFA counterpart Michel Platini, however, said this week that the five officials being used in Euro 2012 were enough to prevent any controversial decisions.

Collina tried to put the Ukraine incident into context, saying the five officials system had been trialled successfully over “thousands of matches” in European domestic competitions.

“This is the only problem we have had,” he said. “It’s one negative decision in three years of Champions League and two years of Europa League and 24 matches in the Euro,” he told reporters.

“I would be very happy to know if the same questions would have been asked without yesterday’s decision.”

UEFA secretary-general Gianni Infantino added: “It’s one error in 1,000 cases in three years of experiments with five officials. It’s human error, by centimetres, but from our point of view as a whole over three years, it’s very positive.”

Collina said the decision was not a reflection on Kassai’s overall performance, even though he has not been retained for the rest of the tournament, and revealed officials had a 95.7 percent accuracy rate in calling offside in the group stages.

He said the correct call was made for three disputed goals: one by Spain’s Jesus Navas in their 1-0 win against Croatia and two by Cristiano Ronaldo in Portugal’s 2-1 win against the Netherlands.

“They were two very, very difficult decisions taken by the assistant referees: from the first pass, (Andres) Iniesta was level. Navas was behind the line with the goal. The two goals by Cristiano Ronaldo were very difficult decisions,” he added.

But a goal by Greece against the Czech Republic should not have been disallowed for offside, Collina said, again blaming “human error


http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/06/20/euro-2012-ukraine-was-denied-a-goal-vs-england-chief-referee-admits/

Euro 2012

Euro 2012: Ukraine denied a goal vs. England, chief referee admits

  Jun 20, 2012 – 11:05 AM ET | Last Updated: Jun 20, 2012 11:30 AM ET

FILIPPO MONTEFORTE/AFP/Getty Images

UEFA’s chief refereeing officer Pierluigi Collina on Wednesday said that a Ukraine effort ruled out against England in their final Euro 2012 Group D match for not crossing the goal line should have been given.Collina’s assessment and outrage in Ukraine have once again opened the debate about the introduction of goal-line technology that world governing body FIFA is in favour of but its European counterparts UEFA is against.

“The ball crossed the line. That was unfortunate,” Collina told a news conference in the Polish capital, Warsaw, the day after the Group D match in Donetsk that England won 1-0.

Collina blamed human error for the “wrong” call but said decisions on two similar incidents in the 24 matches so far played in the tournament — in the Germany-Portugal and Italy-Croatia group matches — had been correct.

The incident arose in the 62nd minute of the game with the score at 1-0, when Ukraine’s Marko Devic forced England’s Joe Hart into a save and the ball looped back over the goalkeeper towards the net.

Defender John Terry acrobatically leapt to clear the ball from under the bar. Television replays indicated the ball crossed the line but Hungarian referee Viktor Kassai — advised by an assistant referee on the line — waved play on.

England kept their one-goal lead and advanced to a quarter-final meeting with Italy. Ukraine were eliminated, although a draw would still not have been enough to take them through.

Kassai’s decision was greeted with dismay in Ukraine.

“The result of the match turned on a gross error by the officials who didn’t give the Ukrainian goal,” Ukraine’s Sport-Express newspaper said on its website.

“And it all happened with five officials, two of whom were in charge of seeing whether a ball crosses the line.”

FIFA is trialling two prototypes of goal-line technology and a decision is expected on its introduction when the organisation’s rules body, the International Football Association Board, meets in Kiev in July.

FIFA president Sepp Blatter wrote on the micro-blogging site Twitter on Wednesday: “After last night’s match #GLT (goal-line technology) is no longer an alternative but a necessity.”

His UEFA counterpart Michel Platini, however, said this week that the five officials being used in Euro 2012 were enough to prevent any controversial decisions.

Collina tried to put the Ukraine incident into context, saying the five officials system had been trialled successfully over “thousands of matches” in European domestic competitions.

“This is the only problem we have had,” he said. “It’s one negative decision in three years of Champions League and two years of Europa League and 24 matches in the Euro,” he told reporters.

“I would be very happy to know if the same questions would have been asked without yesterday’s decision.”

UEFA secretary-general Gianni Infantino added: “It’s one error in 1,000 cases in three years of experiments with five officials. It’s human error, by centimetres, but from our point of view as a whole over three years, it’s very positive.”

Collina said the decision was not a reflection on Kassai’s overall performance, even though he has not been retained for the rest of the tournament, and revealed officials had a 95.7 percent accuracy rate in calling offside in the group stages.

He said the correct call was made for three disputed goals: one by Spain’s Jesus Navas in their 1-0 win against Croatia and two by Cristiano Ronaldo in Portugal’s 2-1 win against the Netherlands.

“They were two very, very difficult decisions taken by the assistant referees: from the first pass, (Andres) Iniesta was level. Navas was behind the line with the goal. The two goals by Cristiano Ronaldo were very difficult decisions,” he added.

But a goal by Greece against the Czech Republic should not have been disallowed for offside, Collina said, again blaming “human error”.

Posted in: Euro 2012, Soccer, Sports  Tags:

Sponsored Links
FanXchange
For sports, concert, and theatre tickets visit FanXchange, Canada's online ticket marketplace.

Posted in: Euro 2012SoccerSports  Tags: Group D




FELIX BRYCH (HOFFENHEIM V BAYER LEVERKUSEN, 18/102013)

One of the more forgiveable errors on the list, nonetheless this is something of a howler. Leverkusen's Stefan Kiessling rose like a salmon to head home a corner in what looked like a routine set piece goal; the ball nestling in the back of the net and referee Brych awarding the goal. However, upon watching a replay, it soon became clear that the ball had not entered the net via the goal - instead, it had managed to get through a hole in the side-netting. Leverkusen director of sport Rudi Voller commented, brilliantly, saying, "(Hoffenheim president)Dietmar Hopp has spent so much money on such a beautiful stadium, you'd think he would be able to spend a few more euros for a decent net."


[ WITH TPS REFEREEING SUCH  GHOST OR PHANTOM OR ILLUSORY GOAL WOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN AWARDED ]


talian referee Nicola Rizzoli should have blown for a penalty when a shot from Andres Iniesta was stopped by Atletico midfielder Gabi's hand in his team's penalty area after 90 minutes.

The referee spotted the infraction but erroneously believed that it had taken place outside of the box and awarded a free kick to Barcelona.

[ WITH TPS REFEREEING, THE GOAL LINEMAN WOULD HAVE EASILY DETECTED THAT THE INFRACTION OCCURRED INSIDE THE PENALTY AREA ] 

According to MARCA pundit and ex-international referee Andujar Oliver, it should have been a penalty.talian referee Nicola Rizzoli should have blown for a penalty when a shot from Andres Iniesta was stopped by Atletico midfielder Gabi's hand in his team's penalty area after 90 minutes. The referee spotted the infraction but erroneously believed that it had taken place outside of the box and awarded a free kick to Barcelona. According to MARCA pundit and ex-international referee Andujar Oliver, it should have been a penalty. talian referee Nicola Rizzoli should have blown for a penalty when a shot from Andres Iniesta was stopped by Atletico midfielder Gabi's hand in his team's penalty area after 90 minutes. The referee spotted the infraction but erroneously believed that it had taken place outside of the box and awarded a free kick to Barcelona. According to MARCA pundit and ex-international referee Andujar Oliver, it should have been a penalty.

[ WITH TPS REFEREEING THE GOA LINEMAN WOULD HAVE A PANORAMIC VIEW AND WOULD FIND EXACTLY WHERE THE INFRACTION OCCURRED INSIDE OR OUTSIDE THE PENALTY BOX AREA AND WOULD HAVE GIVEN  CLEAR SIGN TO THE CENTRAL REFEREE FOR A PENALTY KICK ]


*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28 referees system to avoid errors

     More Referees than Players          How Funny !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WORST REF MISTAKES

 

 

 

 

 

Make a free website with Yola