Platinni wants 2 Extra Assistant Referees ( It is just another name for GOAL LINEMEN )

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/7193771.stm

 Platinni wants Penalty Box Officials ( It is just another name of GOAL LINEMAN)

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2007/may/16/newsstory.sport4

UEFA President Platini want Extra refs, not video replays

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/soccer/uefa-president-platini-wants-extra-refs-not-video-replays-1.804672

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/eng_prem/5004364.stm

Referee wearing a headset camera to detect infringement of the game in Netherland

90 Minutes before the start of the match all technologies should be turned off :

http://baylors3.com/tech-sports-sponsorships/ Where is the next tech battlefield? Predicting the future of sponsors on the field Jul 1, 2013 Eric FernandezBroadcasts, Digital Strategy, July 2013, Relate, Sell,Social Media,SponsorshipsGoogle Glass, IFAB,Microsoft, NFL,prognostication,sponsorship strategy, Surface,trendsNo comments Microsoft Surface on the sidelines In May, the NFL announced a ground breaking partnership with Microsoft that would bring interactive features to fans watching at home through the X-box One console (in-game Skyping, split screen to view game feeds with stats and fantasy updates, etc) and provide a significant tech upgrade to the field of play. Until now, with the exception of headset communication, all technology had to be turned off 90 min before game time. Coaches used Polaroid images, static play sheets and wipe boards as in-game teaching aids. With the Microsoft agreement, the Surface tablet will make its way to sidelines allowing coaches a new, dynamic medium to provide players feedback and coaching in real-time. Additionally, referees will use the Surface tablet to monitor replays from the sideline. Sponsors getting on the field From a branding standpoint, the NFL field-of-play is arguably the most premium available real estate – a three hour engagement opportunity with no brand clutter. Branding opportunities have been limited to three categories: 1. player uniforms and coaches apparel (Nike), 2. isotonic drinks (Gatorade) and 3. coaches headsets, which until last season was owned by Motorola, but is currently available, and noteworthy that is was not part of either the Microsoft agreement or recent Verizon NFL extension. Tech brands are finding the field-of-play, in particular the NFL gridiron, as the battleground for building their business and brands with consumers. Consider some recent examples and what might happen in the future: Victor and his glasses 1) Now: US Women’s tennis player Bethanie Mattek-Sands using Google Glass as a training aid for her Wimbledon preparation. As a player, it providers her coach a first-person viewpoint of how she’s reacting. As the video lead-in shows, in addition to providing her training benefits, it provides a unique and intriguing camera angle for TV viewers (which is not available…yet). Or just check out Victor Oladipo at the NBA draft. The Future: Imagine NFL referees wearing Google Glass or better yet, quarterback’s helmets equipped with Google Glass to provide a unique TV camera angle. 2) Now: I.F.A.B., soccer’s preeminent lawmaking body, announced in 2012 that chip technology would be implanted in balls to identify when they’ve crossed the goal line. Using Hawk-Eye and GoalRef technology, the English Premier League has tested the technology to aid referees. The Future: The NFL should not be too far behind since one of the most controversial, and time consuming, officiating decisions is goal line touchdowns. 3) Now: Technologists are developing brain sensing pads that can be placed in NFL headgear to measure hit impact for concussions. The Future: Still in the early phases, given the NFL’s focus on game safety, I’d anticipate this rolling out by 2014. Given the scale and deep engagement of the NFL, I’d anticipate more tech companies looking to use the NFL as a platform to build their business. If they can integrate their technology to improve the game and the fan experience, it can serve as a relevant content platform that would be better than any form of paid advertising.

      Lady Inventor

Lamarr the inventor

Despite no formal scientific training, Hedy Lamarr had an exceptional scientific mind, and with her co-inventor George Antheil, they developed a system for radio communication today that is at the core of many communications systems, including the GSM cell phone system that is in use by over 1.2 billion subscribers worldwide. Now the concept is also used as the basis of many military communications schemes where the hopping is used to prevent jamming and is used in cellular systems including GSM to reduce the effects of interference and in some wireless systems for the same reason.

Their war-time invention for radio communication to 'hop' from one frequency to another, so that Allied torpedoes couldn't be detected by the Nazi.

Patent number 2,292,387 was granted on 11th August 1941 as a "Secret Communication System". The patent also specified that a high-altitude observation plane could be used to steer a torpedo. This invention was the first instance of spread-spectrum communications based on frequency-hopping techniques.

Sadly this technological invention is being used in football to apply TPS refereeing in Camouflage.

     ................................................................................................................................................................................

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-cup/0/var-rules-used-fifa-world-cup-2018-russia/

                                                            This is NOT VAR Room. It is in fact the TPS Room 

All the Triangular & Panoramic Findings are communicated to the ground central referee through the secret radio headset communication system.

https://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/ridiculous-refereeing-obsession-why-hell-would-you-bother

This Fantastic Screen is mentioned & Originates in TPS research work.                  See above extract from manuscript on Communication.

Fifa has only modified & made it readable by one and ALL .

V A R : TOTAL  NONESENSE  -  CHAOS  -  CALLS  for  STOPPAGE

 https://talksport.com/football/625360/shut-down-stockley-park-john-motson-var-chaos/

John Motson has urged referee chiefs to ‘shut down Stockley Park’ and give control back to match-day officials after VAR’s ‘chaotic’ start in the Premier League.

We are witnessing one of the most exciting and open top flight campaigns in years, with just six points separating fifth and seventeenth place.

But VAR controversy has stolen the headlines continuously over the past four months, with inconsistent decisions – and the time it takes to make them – sparking fury and frustration from managers, players and supporters, who are often left completely baffled by the lack of information in the stadium.

This weekend alone saw plenty of high-profile incidents, including Liverpool striker Roberto Firmino having a goal disallowed for offside when even after several replays it was unclear what the off-site video referees saw to make such a decision.

And Motty has finally had enough, saying fans are being ‘marginalised’ and referees MUST start using pitch-side screens to make the decisions themselves.

Venting his outrage on Hawksbee and Jacobs, the legendary football commentator said: “We’re now in the fourth month of the season and it’s still chaos.

“It’s just not working!

“I’m serious, I would shut Stockley Park down. Leave it to the match referee, give him the pitch-side monitor and carry on.

“It seems to me that some of the senior referees, one in one place and one in another, are sort of vying with each other now. It’s nonsense!

“What’s the fourth official doing? He’s a class-one referee, and they’ve got four of them out there!

“Honestly, I knew it would be bad but my goodness, I didn’t think it would be this bad.

“I was talking to the Watford owner last week and he says it is terrible in Italy. I knew it would be terrible here.

“The other thing that’s annoying me about this is the spectator is just being absolutely marginalised.

THE  NEW  NORMAL

https://www.si.com/soccer/2019/06/22/womens-world-cup-var-rules-penalty-kicks-goalkeepers-defenders-referees

As VAR Shows at Women's World Cup, This is the New Normal

• The implementation of VAR at the Women's World Cup is unlike its introduction in last summer's World Cup in Russia, with a new emphasis on certain rules and time-consuming review processes carrying a heavy influence in France.

By AVI CREDITORAVI CREDITOR 

June 22, 2019

The 2019 Women's World Cup has been brought to you by three letters: V. A. R.

The mandate of VAR–video assistant referees–was not to become the story of the competition where it's used but instead to rectify incorrect calls and ensure the deserving parties are rewarded and undeserving ones are punished. Remove controversy–don't add to it.

Well, that hasn't quite been the case in France over the last two-plus weeks.

On three occasions (South Africa vs. Spain, Norway vs. France, Nigeria vs. Germany), follow-throughs on challenges inside the box that otherwise looked innocuous in realtime have been flagged for review and ultimately turned into penalties. That players of the supposedly aggrieved teams didn't show a hint of protest after the fouls in question were committed dictates plenty about how unexpected those game-changing calls wound up being. It's not that kicking an opposing player in the box shouldn't be whistled, but it's always going to look different and more flagrant–not to mention out of context–when slowed down on replay.

On two massive occasions, and three in total, goalkeepers have been flagged for leaving the goal line too early on penalty kicks, resulting in both retakes–which have shaped the field of teams that reached the knockout rounds and where in the bracket they've gone–and yellow cards. The excessiveness of the rule was highlighted when IFAB, the rules-making association, instituted a hold on the regulation, so that if it occurred in a penalty shootout during the knockout stage, goalkeepers wouldn't be carded (and ejected) left and right. England's Premier League, which is instituting VAR next season, immediately came out saying that goalkeeper encroachment won't be subjected to review, leaving that to referees to decide in the moment. There was a choice in the matter, and FIFA chose to act as it did in time for the biggest competition.

"It kind of tells you everything you need to know," former England international and FOX TV analyst Eniola Aluko said following Germany's 3-0 win over Nigeria in the round of 16 on Saturday, in which VAR was consulted on the first two goals of the match. "The biggest league in the world is not going to implement this rule."

This wasn't an issue last summer in Russia, when VAR made its first foray onto a senior World Cup stage. The rules being emphasized were ones players had been accustomed to playing under for years, not ones being pushed to the front of the queue six days before the start of the competition. Some of the leagues where those players were employed had already instituted the technology, so they were used to the referee making the rectangular motion with his pointer fingers and the circumstances under which it was happening.

The women, for various reasons, haven't been exposed to that before, but that was not a huge concern entering the competition, as players and coaches pleaded for the implementation of VAR for months before FIFA finally acquiesced. What they didn't expect, however, was the ways in which it would be used and the rules it would be looking to enforce.

On top of everything else, the review process is taking a lifetime to complete. Last summer, referees would either trust the VAR's eyes to get the call right or instantly go take a look for themselves. It wasn't perfect every time, but it was a largely seamless process. All of the fears going into the competition were, for the most part, allayed. France 2019 has been marked by lengthy reviews that first start with a conversation between the VAR and referee and then, after considerable time, the referee running over to the side monitor to take a look. The instincts needed to speed things up just aren't there.

"I don't remember lengthy ones like this at the men's World Cup in Russia," agitated FOX broadcaster JP Dellacamera remarked during a review in Norway and Australia's last-16 matchup on Saturday.

This summer, VAR has turned into the soccer equivalent of driving speed cameras. It's there to hold its targets accountable for things that previously might have been let go either in the spirit of the game or because ultimately, in realtime, there was no hint of a major infraction. Is barely going over the speed limit on a clear road really worth punishing, even if it's technically illegal? You'd have rarely been flagged for that prior to the intervention of technology, when sensible subjectivity was still a prevalent factor. But such is life at the Women's World Cup, where it's unfortunate players are being exposed to the new points of emphasis for the first time–and their World Cup fortunes are being determined as a result.

"It seems like a bit of an experiment," Aluko said. "It seems like a bit of a guinea pig."

Aluko isn't wrong, and these players are being used to establish the new normal. So, goalkeepers, keep at least a foot on the line during penalty kicks. Defenders, keep your arms from being extended at all and watch the follow-throughs on your challenges and clearance attempts.

Regardless of what you'd been taught to do before, the cameras are watching.

 V A R - NONESENSE - 16 CAMERAS CANNOT CAPTURE WHAT THE

HUMAN EYES CAN

 https://www.dutchreferee.com/esfandiar-baharmast-saw-something-16-cameras-couldnt-see/